Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (8) TMI 195 - AT - Central ExciseExtract: .......ing documents has been provided in sub- rule (4) of Rule 57H of the Rules because it contained non obstante clause contained in Rule 57G of the Rules. That clearly answers the argument of the learned D.R. We, therefore, following our earlier order reject the contentions of the D.R and dismiss the appeal filed by the department. 5. Appeal dismissed.
|