Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (5) TMI 124 - CEGAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......of deposit of duty was not that it had been paid, but that, since in the light of the clarification issued by the Board that the sums payable in terms of Rule 57CC were not duty, the provisions of Section 35F would not be applicable. 3. The reference elsewhere in the order to this sum were made in the context of the penalty imposed on the assessee.
|