Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2003 (12) TMI 219 - AT - Central Excise
Issues:
Whether wires and cables cleared without payment of duty after entry in RG-1 register for testing are liable to duty or not. Analysis: The appeal was filed by M/s. RPG Cables Ltd. against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Bangalore. The main issue to be decided was whether wires and cables cleared without payment of duty after entry in RG-1 register for testing are liable to duty or not. The appellant's advocate argued that the wires and cables were tested as per customer requirements, and duty was paid on the scrap generated after testing. He cited previous Tribunal decisions to support the argument that cables used for mandatory quality control tests should not be considered excisable goods. On the other hand, the Revenue representative contended that the appellants failed to prove that the quality control tests were mandatory and did not maintain proper records. The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of mandatory quality control tests exempting goods from excise duty if properly accounted for. However, they noted that the appellants did not follow the prescribed procedure for removal of wires/cables for inspection and tests as per the Trade Notice. The Tribunal found that the appellants did not provide the Department with the necessary information to verify the testing process and scrap generated for remission of duty. Consequently, the lower authorities' decision to demand duty was upheld, and the appeal was rejected.
|