Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2003 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2003 (12) TMI 219 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Whether wires and cables cleared without payment of duty after entry in RG-1 register for testing are liable to duty or not.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by M/s. RPG Cables Ltd. against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Bangalore. The main issue to be decided was whether wires and cables cleared without payment of duty after entry in RG-1 register for testing are liable to duty or not. The appellant's advocate argued that the wires and cables were tested as per customer requirements, and duty was paid on the scrap generated after testing. He cited previous Tribunal decisions to support the argument that cables used for mandatory quality control tests should not be considered excisable goods. On the other hand, the Revenue representative contended that the appellants failed to prove that the quality control tests were mandatory and did not maintain proper records. The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of mandatory quality control tests exempting goods from excise duty if properly accounted for. However, they noted that the appellants did not follow the prescribed procedure for removal of wires/cables for inspection and tests as per the Trade Notice. The Tribunal found that the appellants did not provide the Department with the necessary information to verify the testing process and scrap generated for remission of duty. Consequently, the lower authorities' decision to demand duty was upheld, and the appeal was rejected.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates