Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (1) TMI 113 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......ce on record that this duty paid by the respondents was ever recovered by them from their customers. As the differential duty was paid by the respondents on re-determination of the capacity of the stenter and the same was not recovered from their customers, in these circumstances, we find no infirmity in the impugned order. The appeal is dismissed.
|