Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (1) TMI 236 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......ng falling under the Heading 84.71 were excluded. Leaving the controversy at that, as I observed, the eligibility of the item having been decided under Rule 57Q in the CEGAT judgment or alternatively under Rule 57A, as analysed by me, the denial of credit cannot be justified. 7. Revenue appeal is accordingly required to be rejected. Hence rejected.
|