Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (11) TMI 174 - CESTAT, CHENNAIExtract: .......as not correct. But the reasoning of ld. Commissioner for vacating the penalty is also faulty. 4. For the reasons recorded above. I set aside the impugned order and allow this appeal to the extent of imposing a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) on the respondents under the 4th proviso to sub-rule (3) of Rule 96ZO of Central Excise Rules, 1944.
|