Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (11) TMI 249 - CESTAT, CHENNAIExtract: .......ve facts. It is pertinent to note that the party has not even attempted to explain why they did not file appeal against the ACP order soon after they realised (in January 2000) that they were paying excess duty based on the said order. 5. The application is rejected. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed. (Dictated and pronounced in open Court)
|