Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (2) TMI 192 - CESTAT, CHENNAIExtract: .......er only and not in the hands of their job worker who did not pay anything of such value to the brand name owner. The view taken by the original authority has rightly been overruled in the impugned order by ld. Commissioner (Appeals). We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal of the Revenue is, accordingly, rejected.
|