Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (10) TMI 116 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......003 (155) E.L.T. 8 (S.C.), and we find no reason to uphold the order of the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in this case. 6. Since no duty demands as arrived at are being upheld, the penalty under Rule 173Q is also required to be set aside. 7. In view of the findings, this appeal is to be allowed. Ordered accordingly. (Pronounced in Court on 25-10-2005)
|