Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2005 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (1) TMI 285 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......n the application is hardly sufficient for condoning inordinate delay. 3. We are not satisfied with the explanation offered in the above applications. The delay has not been satisfactorily explained. We, therefore dismiss the applications. As a result, stay applications and appeals are dismissed as time barred. (Operative part pronounced in Court).
|