Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (4) TMI 214 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......bai) and held that it is distinguishable for the reason that there are several orders of the Tribunals which have taken the view that minimum difference in weight attributable to difference in calibration of weigh-bridges is not a ground for denial of credit. 3. I, therefore, uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal. (Dictated in the Court).
|