Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in a sum of Rs. 1 lakh on the assessee for the assessment year 1985-86. Details of the Judgment: 1. Issue 1 - Concealment Penalty in Case of Loss Assessment: - The assessee contended that penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as the assessment resulted in a substantial loss of Rs. 9,80,397. - Cited High Court decisions and Tribunal rulings supporting the stance that penalty is not leviable when assessment shows a loss. - Highlighted that the penalty order was based on an item described as "lease expenses" which was actually a provision for customer claims, approved by the Institute of Chartered Accountants. - Departmental Representative argued that the change in the accounting system by the assessee was not properly disclosed, justifying the penalty. - The Tribunal noted various legal precedents and concluded that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied when the assessment results in a loss, based on a strict interpretation of the statutory provisions. 2. Conclusion: - The Tribunal found that the penalty order could not be sustained as the assessment had resulted in a loss, making the penalty under section 271(1)(c) inapplicable. - Consequently, the penalty was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
|