Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues:
Validity of notice issued in the name of deceased assessee and its curability under section 292B. Analysis: The appeal pertains to an order of the CIT (A) for the assessment year 1968-69, where the validity of a notice issued in the name of a deceased assessee was challenged. The Department argued that the notice defect could be cured under section 292B, inserted in 1975, which states that a mistake in a notice shall not invalidate it if in conformity with the Act's intent. However, the respondent contended that a valid notice under section 148 is a prerequisite for reassessment, citing precedents like Madan Lal Agarwal v. CIT and Smt. Phoolmati Devi. The CIT (A) had ruled in favor of the respondent, declaring the assessment void due to the defective notice. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing that a proper notice is essential for jurisdiction in reassessment. The provisions of section 292B do not protect assessments that are void ab initio, and the notice's validity is crucial for the entire reassessment process. Citing various court decisions, the Tribunal concluded that the order of the CIT (A) was correct and dismissed the appeal.
|