Home Case Index All Cases Wealth-tax Wealth-tax + AT Wealth-tax - 1990 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1990 (3) TMI 101 - ITAT BOMBAY-BExtract: .......r the partition the property did not belong to the HUF, or under cl. (c) because the property received no partition belonged to the smaller HUF of the assessee. 13. The other dispute regarding valuation becomes redundant in view of our finding above. We, therefore, express on opinion with respect thereto. 14. In the result, the appeals are allowed.
|