Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues:
Assessment of salary paid to Karta of HUF as a deduction. Analysis: The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi involved the assessment of the salary paid to the Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the assessment year 1976-77. The Karta, Shri R.C. Saboo, received a salary of Rs. 24,000 for managing the affairs of the HUF, which included interests in various businesses. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed Rs. 9,000 out of the total salary paid, stating that a portion of it was used for household purposes. The assessee appealed to the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (AAC), arguing that the increase in the HUF's income was directly attributable to the services rendered by Shri R.C. Saboo. The AAC reduced the disallowance to Rs. 2,400, considering Shri R.C. Saboo's qualifications and previous employment history. However, the Appellate Tribunal found the disallowance made by the ITO and AAC to be unjustified, stating that Shri R.C. Saboo's salary was reasonable considering his contributions to the HUF's increased income. The Tribunal overturned the disallowance and directed the AAC to reconsider the issue of interest charge under section 139(8) amounting to Rs. 2,674. In its analysis, the Tribunal noted that Shri R.C. Saboo's qualifications and track record in increasing the HUF's income significantly justified the salary paid to him. The Tribunal emphasized that the disallowance made by the ITO and AAC lacked a valid basis, especially considering Shri R.C. Saboo's expertise and the impact of his services on the HUF's financial performance. The Tribunal concluded that the full salary paid to Shri R.C. Saboo should have been allowed as a deduction, overturning the previous disallowances. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AAC to reconsider the issue of interest charge under section 139(8), which had not been addressed in the previous proceedings. Ultimately, the appeal by the assessee was successful, and the disallowance of the salary paid to Shri R.C. Saboo was deleted by the Tribunal.
|