2001 (12) TMI 203 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
- Chargeability of income under the head "Capital Gains"
- Interpretation of the term "transfer" under section 2(47) and section 47
- Applicability of section 47(vii) in the case of conversion of shares

Analysis:

1. Chargeability of income under the head "Capital Gains"
The appeal involved a dispute regarding the chargeability of income under the head "Capital Gains" for the assessment year 1992-93. The Assessing Officer had computed the capital gain based on the transfer of shares from one company to another by the assessee. The assessee argued that no transfer took place as the conversion of shares was part of an arrangement and not an amalgamation. The Assessing Officer applied section 47(v)(ii) to compute the capital gain. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, citing a previous judgment. The Tribunal considered the arguments put forth by both parties and analyzed the provisions of the Income Tax Act related to capital gains taxation.

2. Interpretation of the term "transfer" under section 2(47) and section 47
The Tribunal delved into the definition of "transfer" under section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, which includes various transactions like sale, exchange, or relinquishment of assets. The Tribunal examined the case law, including the decision of the Supreme Court in Vania Silk Mills (P.) Ltd., to determine the scope of the term "transfer." It was highlighted that recent judgments, such as in the case of Mrs. Grace Collis, expanded the interpretation of "extinguishment of any rights" beyond just transfers. The Tribunal analyzed the evolution of legal interpretations and emphasized the broader understanding of the term "transfer" in light of recent judicial pronouncements.

3. Applicability of section 47(vii) in the case of conversion of shares
The Tribunal addressed the contention raised by the assessee regarding the application of section 47(vii) to the conversion of shares from one company to another. The Tribunal noted that section 47(vii) specifically pertains to transfers in a scheme of amalgamation, where companies merge to form a single entity. Since the case at hand involved a different arrangement where both companies maintained separate legal identities, the Tribunal concluded that section 47(vii) did not apply. The Tribunal emphasized that without a provision similar to section 47(vii) for arrangements other than amalgamations, the assessee could not avoid tax liability for the transaction. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) based on the legal and factual analysis presented.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the tax liability of the assessee for the transaction involving the conversion of shares between two companies. The detailed analysis provided clarity on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents in determining the tax implications of the transaction under consideration.