Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues: Disallowance of car expenses and addition of manufacturing expenses
Disallowance of Car Expenses: The appeal was against the disallowance of Rs. 3075 out of car expenses claimed by the assessee. The disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A) due to lack of evidence proving the claim as excessive. The ITAT also found no material to interfere with the CIT(A)'s decision. Therefore, the disallowance was upheld. Addition of Manufacturing Expenses: The addition of Rs. 86,720 out of the total claim of Rs. 1,15,625 was contested by the assessee. The dispute arose from the fall in gross profit rate compared to the previous year. The ITO initially accepted the reasons provided by the assessee for the fall in profit rate but later made an addition to the expenses claimed. This addition was based on the alleged inflation of Jhalai expenses by the assessee to reduce taxation. The ITO's decision was supported by the AAC. However, the ITAT found contradictions in the ITO's findings. While the ITO accepted the gross profit rate, he still made additions to expenses, which would increase the gross profit. The ITAT also noted that the statements of workers made during the survey were not provided by the revenue. The ITAT analyzed the statements made by workers during assessment proceedings and found them to be in favor of the assessee. The ITAT concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the addition of manufacturing expenses. Therefore, the addition was reversed, and the assessee was granted relief of Rs. 86,720. Conclusion: The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, reversing the addition of manufacturing expenses. The disallowance of car expenses was upheld.
|