Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2009 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (7) TMI 224 - CESTAT, CHENNAIVide the impugned order, the Commissioner has dismissed the appeal of the assessees on the ground that the appeal was filed eleven days beyond the statutory period of limitation - the Office of the Commissioner (Appeals) had communicated to the appellants that they were required to rectify the mistake of not affixing sufficient court fee stamp - After the court fee stamp was affixed, the papers were once again filed by the assessee before the lower appellate authority - Since the Commissioner (Appeals) has wrongly held that the appeal is barred by limitation, I set aside the impugned order and remand the matter
|