Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2024 (6) TMI 47 - AT - Service TaxExport of Inventory Management Services - Refund eligibility of cenvat credit for input services in relation to exported services - 100% EOU - HELD THAT - On going through the CBEC Circular 120/01/2010-ST dated 19.01.2010 and the case-laws cited by the respondents we find that the issue is no longer res integra. It has been held by the Principal Bench in the case of Convergys India Pvt. Ltd. 2009 (5) TMI 50 - CESTAT NEW DELHI that when no dispute was raised by the Department about the eligibility to credit to the respondents which they have taken refund/rebate cannot be denied. We also find that as per the case-law cited above the services like Security Services Commercial Coaching and Training Services Rent-a-Cab Service and House Keeping Services have been held to have been availed in the course of furtherance of the business of the respondents and therefore have a nexus with the exported services. Thus we find that the impugned order does not require any interference and therefore the appeal does not survive. In the result the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Issues Involved: Refund eligibility of cenvat credit for input services in relation to exported services.
Summary: The case involved a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in export of Inventory Management Services, seeking refund of cenvat credit under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The original authority partially granted the refund, leading to an appeal by the respondents. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund for input services like Security Services, Commercial Coaching and Training Services, Rent-a-Cab Service, and House Keeping Services. The Revenue appealed against this decision, arguing that these services lacked nexus with the output service provided by the respondents. The Authorized Representative for the Revenue reiterated the lack of nexus between the impugned services and the output service, seeking to set aside the order on that basis. On the other hand, the Chartered Accountant for the respondents cited precedents and Circular 120/01/2010-ST to support the liberal construction of the nexus condition for exporters' refund eligibility. Various Tribunal decisions were also relied upon to establish the nexus between the services and the business of the respondents. After considering the arguments and case laws presented, the Tribunal found that the issue had been settled in previous judgments. It was noted that the services in question were deemed to have a nexus with the exported services, based on precedents and Circular guidelines. Consequently, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced in Open Court on 30.05.2024, with the appeal being dismissed as the impugned order did not require any interference based on the established nexus between the services and the business activities of the respondents.
|