Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (9) TMI 37 - SCH - Income TaxSearch and Seizure - Validity of Order passed u/s 132(3) prohibiting petitioners/assessee from removing articles (liquor bottles) in the cupboard at the resident without prior permission of the IT Authorities - As decided by HC 2023 (11) TMI 654 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT Revenue has failed to satisfy that this was a case which made it impossible/impracticable for Revenue to seize the liquor found at the premises of petitioners and therefore it can be presumed that there were no compelling reasons to invoke Section 132(3) - Delay filling SLP - HELD THAT - There is gross delay of 200 days in filing this Special Leave Petition. The reasons assigned are neither satisfactory nor sufficient in law to be condoned. The application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently the Special Leave Petition also stands dismissed on the ground of delay.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 200-day delay in filing, with the reasons for delay deemed unsatisfactory. The application for condonation of delay was also dismissed. The Court left open the possibility of raising any legal questions in a future case.
|