Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2009 (8) TMI 375 - AT - Service TaxPenalty- suppression- The assessees are aggrieved by the imposition of penalty u/s 78. Commissioner(Appeals) set aside the penalty u/s76 as there was some reasonable cause. Tribunal held that no argument given by the commissioner (Appeals) on the penalty u/s78 - thus the matter is remand back.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI allowed the appeal by remanding the case for fresh adjudication on the penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act, as the lower authority had not addressed this issue despite setting aside the penalty under section 76. The case is to be reconsidered with an opportunity for the assessees to present their defense.
|