Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2024 (12) TMI 1252 - SCH - CustomsCondonation of a gross delay of 326 326 330 330 and 333 days respectively in filing the Civil Appeals which has not been satisfactorily explained - Under-valuation of imported goods - Demand of differential customs duty - demand based on load port documents - it was held by CESTAT that the impugned order in so far as the same is concerned with imports through said 365 Bills of Entry in respect of enhancement of value confirmation of differential Customs duty order to pay interest confiscation of said goods and penalties imposed including personal penalties is set aside. HELD THAT - There are no good reason to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal - Civil Appeals are accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Civil Appeals due to a gross delay of 326, 326, 330, 330, and 333 days respectively in filing the appeals, which were not satisfactorily explained by the Appellant - Revenue. The Court also found no good reason to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
|