9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (5) TMI 1492 - AT - Income TaxDisallowing deduction u/s 80JJAA - belated filing of the prescribed form 10DA - HELD THAT - Filing of Form 10DA is directory which stands fulfilled once Accountant s Report is furnished and deduction u/s 80JJAA of the Act cannot be denied solely for belated filing of the prescribed form. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that Form 10DA was filed on 30th December 2023 which was prior to intimation drawn u/s 143(1) of the Act on 27.03.2024. Therefore while processing the return of income u/s 143(1) of the Act the relevant form was available with the CPC to enable grant of deduction u/s 80JJAA - See INTERNATIONAL TRACTORS LTD 2021 (4) TMI 1033 - DELHI HIGH COURT M/S. CANADIAN SPECIALTY VINYLS 2023 (10) TMI 906 - ITAT DELHI - Thus it is held that the ld. AO wrongly rejected the claim of deduction u/s 80JJAA of the Act for belated filing of Form 10DA - Decided in favour of assessee.
1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED
The core legal questions considered in this appeal are: (a) Whether the deduction under section 80JJAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter 'the Act') can be denied solely on the ground of belated filing of Form 10DA, which is a prescribed form for claiming such deduction? (b) Whether the filing of Form 10DA is a mandatory and jurisdictional condition precedent for claiming deduction under section 80JJAA, or a procedural/formal requirement that can be cured if the requisite form is filed before the assessment is completed? (c) Whether the claim for deduction under section 80JJAA can be admitted at the appellate stage even if it was not allowed or considered at the assessment stage, particularly in cases where the return was processed under section 143(1) by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) and no opportunity was afforded to the assessee to make the claim before the Assessing Officer (AO)? 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue (a) and (b): Validity of denial of deduction under section 80JJAA for belated filing of Form 10DA Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 80JJAA of the Act provides deduction in respect of employment generation. Form 10DA is prescribed to be filed along with the return of income to claim this deduction. The issue of whether the filing of Form 10DA is mandatory at the time of filing return or whether it is a procedural requirement has been considered in various judicial pronouncements. Key precedents relied upon include:
Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Court examined the sequence of events where the assessee filed the original return with Form 10DA on 29.11.2023 and subsequently revised the return with Form 10DA on 30.12.2023, prior to the processing of the return by CPC on 27.03.2024. The AO disallowed the deduction on the ground of belated filing of Form 10DA. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance relying on the Supreme Court decision in PCIT vs. Wipro Ltd., which distinguished claims under Chapter III and Chapter VIA of the Act. The Tribunal analyzed the principle that filing of Form 10DA is a procedural compliance and not a condition precedent to the claim itself. The Court referred to the ITAT Kolkata Bench's decision in Captain Steel India Ltd. which held that a claim of deduction under section 80JJAA can be admitted at the appellate stage even if not allowed at the assessment stage, especially where the return was processed under section 143(1) by CPC and the assessee had no opportunity to file a revised return before the AO. The Ahmedabad Bench in Akuntha Projects (P) Ltd. also held that procedural lapses in filing Form 10DA cannot be a ground to deny deduction if the form is furnished before the assessment order is passed. The Court emphasized that the furnishing of the audit report is mandatory but the timing and mode of filing is procedural, and if the report is available before assessment, the deduction cannot be denied. Key evidence and findings: The assessee filed the revised return along with Form 10DA before the issuance of intimation under section 143(1). The CPC had the requisite form on record at the time of processing. The assessee had been claiming and allowed the deduction under section 80JJAA for preceding and subsequent assessment years. Application of law to facts: The Court applied the principle that procedural compliance, such as timely filing of Form 10DA, should not defeat substantive rights of the assessee to claim deduction. The Court found that the AO erred in disallowing the deduction solely on the ground of belated filing when the form was furnished before completion of assessment. Treatment of competing arguments: The Revenue relied on the CIT(A)'s order and Supreme Court decisions emphasizing strict compliance. The Court distinguished the Wipro Ltd. decision on the ground that it dealt with Chapter III claims, whereas section 80JJAA falls under Chapter VIA, where procedural flexibility is allowed. The Court relied on multiple High Court and ITAT decisions favoring the assessee's position. Conclusions: The Court concluded that the denial of deduction under section 80JJAA solely on the ground of belated filing of Form 10DA was incorrect. The filing of Form 10DA is directory and procedural, and once furnished before assessment completion, the deduction must be allowed. Issue (c): Admission of claim for deduction under section 80JJAA at appellate stage Relevant legal framework and precedents: The question whether a claim not made before the AO but raised for the first time before the appellate authority can be admitted is addressed by the Supreme Court in Goetz (India) P. Ltd. The Court held that appellate authorities have jurisdiction to admit such claims. ITAT Kolkata Bench in Captain Steel India Ltd. held that where the return was processed under section 143(1) by CPC and no opportunity was given to the assessee to file revised return or make the claim before AO, the claim can be admitted at the appellate stage. Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Court noted that the assessee had no opportunity to raise the claim before AO due to CPC processing and intimation under section 143(1). The claim for deduction under section 80JJAA was raised at the first appellate stage and was supported by audit reports and Form 10DA filed before assessment completion. Key evidence and findings: The assessee's claim was consistent with claims in preceding and succeeding assessment years, which were allowed. The claim was supported by documentary evidence and audit reports. Application of law to facts: The Court applied the principle that procedural limitations should not prevent the assessee from claiming legitimate deductions, especially where the claim is substantiated and the procedural defect is curable. Treatment of competing arguments: The Revenue contended that the claim should not be admitted as it was not made before AO. The Court rejected this, relying on Supreme Court and ITAT precedents permitting admission of such claims at appellate stage. Conclusions: The Court held that the claim for deduction under section 80JJAA could be admitted and allowed at the appellate stage notwithstanding non-admission at assessment stage. 3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS "It is held that the ld. AO wrongly rejected the claim of deduction u/s 80JJAA of the Act for belated filing of Form 10DA. The filing of Form 10DA is directory which stands fulfilled once the Accountant's Report is furnished and deduction u/s 80JJAA cannot be denied solely for belated filing of the prescribed form." "The claim of deduction under section 80JJAA can be admitted at the appellate stage even if not allowed at the assessment stage, particularly where the return was processed under section 143(1) by CPC and the assessee had no opportunity to make the claim before the AO." "The furnishing of the audit report is a mandatory requirement, but the mode and stage of filing thereof is a procedural aspect and if the requisite audit report is available with the assessing officer before the assessment order is framed, then the claim of deduction cannot be denied even if the audit report was not filed along with the return of income." "The decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in PCIT vs. Wipro Ltd. is distinguishable as it deals with claims under Chapter III, whereas section 80JJAA falls under Chapter VIA of the Act." Final determination: The appeal of the assessee is allowed. The impugned orders of the CIT(A) and AO disallowing deduction under section 80JJAA on the ground of belated filing of Form 10DA are set aside. Deduction under section 80JJAA is granted to the assessee for the assessment year 2023-24.
|
