9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (6) TMI 330 - AAR - GSTClassification of goods - Does barter exchange apply to B2B transactions where payments are made without the involvement of bank transactions? - If Job Work is performed by an unregistered individual does RCM apply? - does RCM cover job work provided by individuals to proprietorship concerns? - is it appropriate to mention the legal name on shipping labels and also ship the bills with discreet packaging? - In cases where insurance of goods is mandatory can we insure the goods for a lesser value? - what are the appropriate HSN codes for scrap melted scrap bars melted rods and melted kacha? - Is E-way bill mandatory for purchase and sale of silver scrap silver ornaments and silver fine? - In situations involving delivery challan for supply on approval job work and repair when is an e-way bill required? - How can the value of products with varying purities but the same name be proved and which documents are necessary for this purpose? - Is it valid under GST to make payments to job workers in the form of materials instead of sales transactions? Does barter exchange apply to B2B transactions where payments are made without the involvement of bank transactions? - If Job Work is performed by an unregistered individual does RCM apply? - HELD THAT - The barter system is covered under the scope of supply and specifically exchange of silver scrap for finished ornaments will be considered a supply under the GST law despite the absence of monetary payments. In this regard it may also be noted that Schedule I to the CGST Act 2017 specifies activities to be treated as supply even if made without consideration. Does RCM cover job work provided by individuals to proprietorship concerns? - HELD THAT - In this regard it is informed that Notification No.13/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 as amended has clearly enumerated the situations which warrant payment of GST under reverse charge mechanism (RCM) and it can be seen that job-work does not figure as one of the activities/situations listed therein. Once it becomes clear that job work is not part of the said notification the question of answering the above query does not arise. Is it appropriate to mention the legal name on shipping labels and also ship the bills with discreet packaging? - HELD THAT - It could be seen that the above query refers to discreet packaging safety purposes and whether to mention the legal name on the shipping labels which are procedural in nature and which are not related to GST or its taxability in any manner. This apart as the said question does not fit into any of the clauses at (a) to (g) of Section 97 (2) of the CGST Act 2017 as enumerated above we are of the considered opinion that no ruling is required to be pronounced in this regard. In cases where insurance of goods is mandatory can we insure the goods for a lesser value? - HELD THAT - No ruling could be issued in respect of this case as well as the question put forth by the applicant does not fall within the scope of Section 97 (2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts 2017 and since the same is not at all related to GST in any manner whatsoever. What are the appropriate HSN codes for scrap melted scrap bars melted rods and melted kacha? - HELD THAT - The HSN codes in respect of the specified materials are as Silver Scrap - 7112 Melted scrap Bars - 7112 Melted Silver Rods - 7106 Melted Kacha (Imperfect Silver) - 7106. Is E-way bill mandatory for purchase and sale of silver scrap silver ornaments and silver fine? - HELD THAT - By virtue of the provisions of provisions of Rule 138(14) of CGST Rules 2017 goods under Chapter 71 including Silver scrap Silver ornaments and Silver fine as referred to by the applicant (except imitation jewellery under HSN 7117) stand exempted from E-way Bill generation at the national level i.e. for inter-state supplies. As far as intra-state movement of such goods is concerned we find that the Commissioner of State Tax Tamilnadu state in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (d) of sub-rule (14) of rule 138 of the TNGST Rules 2017 has declared that no E-way Bill is required to be generated for intra-state movement within the state of Tamilnadu in respect of value and goods notified in the rule 138 of Tamilnadu Goods and Services Tax Rules 2017 until further orders by way of issue of Notification No.6 of 2018 dated 28.03.2018 issued in Rc.46/2018/Taxation/A1. Once the option has been extended to the respective States and Union Territories the state of Kerala has mandated the generation of E-Way Bills for intra-state movement of certain goods under Chapter 71 within their jurisdiction by way of issue of Notification No.10/2024-State Tax dated 27.12.2024 in No. SGST/6282/2023-PLC1. However it is noticed that no such notification has been issued or option exercised by the state of Tamilnadu so far in this regard. Under these circumstances the E-way Bill generation is not required for movement whether intra-state (in Tamilnadu) or inter-state involving sale or purchase of Silver scrap Silver ornaments and Silver fine. In situations involving delivery challan for supply on approval job work and repair when is an e-way bill required? - HELD THAT - As the movement of goods in question in the instant case whether it is in relation to a supply or it is for reasons other than supply both get covered under rule 138 of the rules ibid we are of the opinion that in respect of this query also the aforesaid discussion in para 6.7 holds good and accordingly generation of E-way bill is not required in situations involving supply on approval job work and repair of silver bars and ornaments. How can the value of products with varying purities but the same name be proved and which documents are necessary for this purpose? - HELD THAT - No ruling could be issued in respect of this question as it does not fall within the scope of Section 97 (2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts 2017 and since the same is not related to GST in any manner. Is it valid under GST to make payments to job workers in the form of materials instead of sales transactions? - HELD THAT - No ruling could be issued in respect of this question as it relates to the procedure for making payment of job-worker and accounting of the value involved which are procedural in nature and which does not fall within the scope of Section 97 (2) of the CGST/TNGST Acts 2017.
The core legal questions considered by the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) under the CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, pertain to the applicability of GST provisions in the context of a business engaged in crafting silver products. The issues raised by the applicant can be grouped into three broad categories: (1) the scope and nature of supply under GST including barter transactions and reverse charge mechanism (RCM) applicability; (2) procedural and compliance requirements such as E-way bill generation and packaging; and (3) classification and valuation issues related to silver products.
1. Applicability of GST to Barter Exchange in B2B Transactions The applicant sought clarification on whether barter exchange transactions, specifically the exchange of silver scrap for finished silver ornaments without monetary payments or bank transactions, constitute a taxable supply under GST. The legal framework invoked includes Section 2(83) defining 'Outward Supply' and Section 7(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, which defines the scope of 'supply' to include barter and exchange made or agreed to be made for a consideration in the course or furtherance of business. The definition of 'consideration' under Section 2(31) explicitly includes any payment made or to be made in money or otherwise, thus encompassing non-monetary exchanges. The Court interpreted these provisions to mean that barter transactions are covered under the definition of supply. The exchange of silver scrap for finished ornaments, despite the absence of monetary payments, qualifies as a supply under GST. The Court also referenced Schedule I of the CGST Act, which lists activities treated as supply even without consideration, reinforcing this interpretation. The ruling conclusively states: "Barter system is covered under the scope of 'supply' and specifically exchange of silver scrap for finished ornaments will be considered a 'supply' under the GST law, despite the absence of monetary payments." 2. Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) Applicability on Job Work by Unregistered Individuals The applicant questioned whether RCM applies when job work is performed by unregistered individuals, and whether RCM covers job work provided by individuals to proprietorship concerns. The Court examined Notification No.13/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017, which enumerates activities attracting RCM. Job work was not included in the list of activities attracting reverse charge. Consequently, the Court held that RCM does not apply to job work services, regardless of whether the job worker is unregistered or the recipient is a proprietorship. The Court succinctly concluded: "As job-work does not attract RCM, the question of answering the said query does not arise." 3. Procedural Queries on Shipping Labels and Packaging Confidentiality The applicant sought permission to use the legal name instead of the trade name on shipping labels and to employ discreet packaging that does not disclose the nature of the goods for security reasons. The Court found that these procedural matters do not fall within the scope of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, which limits advance rulings to issues related to classification, applicability of notifications, time and value of supply, input tax credit admissibility, liability to pay tax, registration requirements, and whether an activity amounts to a supply. Since the query pertains to shipping and packaging procedures unrelated to GST taxability, no ruling was issued. 4. Insurance Coverage Based on Lesser Value than Actual Goods The applicant asked whether insurance for goods, when mandatory, can be based on a value lower than the actual value of goods. The Court held that this question does not relate to GST provisions or fall within the scope of advance ruling. Hence, no ruling was given. 5. Classification of Silver Products under HSN Codes The applicant sought clarification on the appropriate HSN codes for various silver products: silver scrap, melted scrap bars, melted silver rods, and melted 'kacha' (imperfect silver). The Court referred to Schedule V of Notification No.1/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017, which provides the GST rates and HSN classifications for precious metals and related products. The relevant entries are:
Applying these, the Court ruled:
6. E-Way Bill Requirements for Silver Products The applicant queried whether E-way bills are mandatory for purchase and sale of silver scrap, silver ornaments, and silver fine. The Court examined Rule 138 of the CGST Rules, 2017, which governs E-way bill generation, and the exemption under Rule 138(14) and its Annexure. The Annexure exempts goods including precious metals and jewellery under Chapter 71 from E-way bill requirements. The Court also noted the exemption granted by the Tamil Nadu State Government for intra-state movement of such goods. Further, the Court discussed the recent insertion of Rule 138F, which empowers States to mandate E-way bills for intra-state movement of specified goods exceeding a threshold value. The Court observed that Tamil Nadu has not exercised this option. Therefore, the Court held that E-way bills are not mandatory for inter-state or intra-state movement of silver scrap, silver ornaments, and silver fine in Tamil Nadu. 7. E-Way Bill Requirements for Delivery Challans in Supply on Approval, Job Work, and Repair The applicant sought clarity on when E-way bills are required for goods sent under delivery challans for supply on approval, job work, or repair. The Court referred to Rule 55 of the CGST Rules, which allows transportation of goods without invoice via delivery challan for job work and reasons other than supply. Rule 138 covers E-way bill requirements for movement in relation to supply, reasons other than supply, or inward supply from unregistered persons. The Court concluded that the exemption for E-way bills applicable to silver products under Rule 138(14) also extends to goods moved under delivery challans for supply on approval, job work, or repair. Hence, E-way bills are not required in these situations for silver bars and ornaments. 8. Valuation of Products with Varying Purity The applicant asked how to differentiate the value of silver products with varying purities but identical names and what documentation is necessary to prove such differences. The Court held that this question does not fall within the scope of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act and is unrelated to GST taxability. No ruling was issued. 9. Payment to Job Workers in Materials Instead of Monetary Transactions The applicant queried whether it is permissible under GST to pay job workers in the form of materials such as silver or copper rather than monetary transactions. The Court observed that this question relates to procedural and accounting practices and does not fall within the scope of advance ruling provisions. No ruling was issued. Significant Holdings and Core Principles Established:
|
