2025 (6) TMI 1319 - AT - Income Tax

Unexplained money u/s 69A - Cash deposited during the demonetization period in Specified Bank Notes (SBN) - total credits in bank account constitute business turnover for applying net profit rate or not? HELD THAT - We note that entries cannot be considered as part of business turnover of the assessee details of which are already tabulated above. Assessee is engaged in trading business where the volumes are in wholesale since he supplies mostly to the local bakeries where the profit margin are low in the range of 2 to 3% as submitted by him. While making the addition AO has applied net profit rate of 8% against which assessee has proposed to apply profit rate of 3% by taking into account the line of business in which he is engaged in. Thus to meet the ends of justice we find it appropriate to restrict net profit rate at 4% on the credits in the bank account after reducing amount of Rs. 35, 45, 416/- Thus ld. Assessing Officer is directed to consider net profit rate of 4% on Rs. 5, 86, 47, 151/- to arrive at business income in the hands of the assessee. Needless to say credit be given for the business income already reported by the assessee in his return. Deposit of cash in SBN in the bank account forms part of the total credit which is treated as business turnover and has been subjected to net profit rate addition in terms of above findings. Thus the same cannot be added again u/s. 69A as unexplained money. Addition made by the ld. Assessing Officer tantamount to bringing the same amount to tax twice. Accordingly addition made of Rs. 38, 65, 500/- u/s. 69A in respect of deposit of cash in SBN is deleted. Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed.

Summary

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered by the Tribunal in this appeal are:

(a) Whether the cash deposited during the demonetization period in Specified Bank Notes (SBN) can be treated as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or whether it should be treated as business income, thereby precluding addition under section 69A.

(b) Whether the total credits in the bank account can be equated to business turnover for the purpose of applying a net profit rate to determine income, or whether certain non-turnover credits should be excluded before applying such a profit rate.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue (a): Treatment of cash deposited in SBN during demonetization period under section 69A

Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 69A of the Income-tax Act deals with unexplained money found during the course of assessment. If any sum is found to be in the possession of the assessee and the assessee offers no satisfactory explanation about the nature and source thereof, such sum is deemed to be income of the assessee.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the cash deposited in SBN amounting to Rs. 38,65,500/- as unexplained money under section 69A. However, the AO himself considered this amount as business income while applying the net profit rate on the total credits in the bank account. The assessee contended that this cash formed part of the business receipts and was duly recorded in the books of accounts, and hence should not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A.

Key evidence and findings: The assessee demonstrated that the bank account where the SBN cash was deposited was a current account used exclusively for business transactions, including payments and receipts related to vendors and customers. The cash deposited in SBN was part of the turnover and was accounted for in the business income computation.

Application of law to facts: Since the cash deposited in SBN was accounted for as business income and included in the turnover on which net profit was applied, treating the same amount as unexplained money under section 69A would result in double taxation of the same sum.

Treatment of competing arguments: The AO's addition under section 69A was based on the premise that the cash was unexplained. The assessee's argument was that the cash was explained and recorded as business income. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's submissions, noting that the AO's own treatment was inconsistent.

Conclusion: The addition under section 69A on the cash deposited in SBN was deleted to avoid double taxation, as the same amount was already considered in the business income computation.

Issue (b): Whether total credits in bank account constitute business turnover for applying net profit rate

Relevant legal framework and precedents: The principle that not all credits in a bank account necessarily constitute business turnover is well established. Only those credits which relate to business receipts should be considered for applying net profit rates for income estimation.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The AO considered the total credits in the bank account amounting to Rs. 6,15,92,567/- as turnover and applied an 8% net profit rate to compute income. The assessee contended that various entries such as opening cash balance deposits, cheque returns, RTGS failed entries, purchase returns, self-deposits, and deposits by family members totaling Rs. 35,45,416/- were not part of business turnover and should be excluded before applying the net profit rate. Further, the assessee submitted that the profit margin in his wholesale trading business was low, around 2-3%, contrary to the 8% applied by the AO.

Key evidence and findings: The assessee furnished detailed particulars of non-turnover credits that should be excluded. The Tribunal noted the nature of the business (retail and wholesale trading of Atta, Besan, and Maida) where profit margins are low due to bulk sales to local bakeries.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal held that the total credits in the bank account could not be equated with turnover without excluding non-business receipts. It accepted that the profit margin in the assessee's line of business was lower than the 8% applied by the AO.

Treatment of competing arguments: The AO's application of an 8% net profit rate on total bank credits was considered arbitrary and not reflective of the actual business scenario. The assessee's proposal to exclude Rs. 35,45,416/- from turnover and apply a 3% profit rate was more consistent with the business facts. To balance the interests of both parties and meet ends of justice, the Tribunal fixed the net profit rate at 4% on the adjusted turnover.

Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the AO to compute business income by applying a 4% net profit rate on Rs. 5,80,47,151/- (total credits less non-turnover credits), giving credit for the income already reported by the assessee.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

"Deposit of cash in SBN in the bank account forms part of the total credit which is treated as business turnover and has been subjected to net profit rate addition in terms of above findings. Thus, the same cannot be added again u/s. 69A as unexplained money. Addition made by the ld. Assessing Officer tantamount to bringing the same amount to tax twice."

"Entries amounting to Rs. 35,45,416/- cannot be considered as part of business turnover of the assessee."

"Considering the overall factual matrix and the submissions made before us, as well as the observations and findings arrived at by the authorities below, to meet the ends of justice, we find it appropriate to restrict net profit rate at 4% on the credits in the bank account after reducing amount of Rs. 35,45,416/-."

The Tribunal established the principle that credits in a bank account must be carefully scrutinized to distinguish business turnover from non-turnover entries before applying net profit rates for income computation. It also underscored that additions under section 69A should not result in double taxation when the same amount is already accounted for as business income.

Final determinations:

(i) The addition of Rs. 38,65,500/- under section 69A on cash deposited in SBN was deleted.

(ii) The net profit addition was recalculated by applying a 4% profit rate on Rs. 5,80,47,151/- after excluding non-turnover credits of Rs. 35,45,416/- from total bank credits.

(iii) The appeal was partly allowed accordingly.