2025 (6) TMI 1913 - AT - Income Tax

Deduction u/s.80P(2)(d) or u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) - interest income earned from the scheduled banks - AO was of the view that the deposits made by the assessee was out of surplus funds and hence the assessee is not entitled for the deduction HELD THAT - We observe that similar issue has been decided by us in the case of Wadakkancherry Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. 2025 (4) TMI 1656 - ITAT COCHIN as held court found that the interest earned by the Society through deposit of such receipts with banks in fact ought to have accrued to the benefit of the individual members and not to the Society itself; that in relation to the Society it was to be treated as income from other sources since the interest income had lost its nexus with the principal income earned by the Society. The facts in the instant cases are entirely different and the investment concerned was of amounts that had already attained the character of surplus profits in the hands of the assessee. On this issue therefore we find ourselves in agreement with the view taken in The Vavveru Cooperative Rural Bank Ltd. . 2017 (4) TMI 663 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT and Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Co-operative Limited 2015 (2) TMI 995 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT . Appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.

Summary

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered in this appeal are:

• Whether the assessee, a co-operative bank, is entitled to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and/or section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act in respect of interest income earned on deposits made with scheduled banks.
• Whether the deposits made by the assessee from surplus funds affect the entitlement to deduction under the said provisions.
• The applicability and interpretation of relevant judicial precedents concerning the nexus between interest income earned on deposits and the principal business income of a co-operative society/bank.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1: Entitlement to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and/or 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act on interest income earned on deposits with scheduled banks

Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 80P of the Income Tax Act provides for deductions to co-operative societies in respect of income derived from certain specified sources. Sub-section (2)(a)(i) and (2)(d) specifically deal with income from banking business and interest on securities or deposits, respectively. The key legal question is whether interest income earned on deposits made by the co-operative bank out of its surplus funds qualifies for deduction under these provisions.

Judicial precedents relevant to this issue include the judgment of the jurisdictional High Court in Sahyadri Cooperative Credit Society Ltd., where the Court distinguished the Supreme Court decision in M/s. The Totgars' Cooperative Sale Society Limited. The High Court observed that in The Totgars' case, interest income earned on surplus receipts that were due to individual members was rightly treated as income from other sources because it lacked nexus with the principal income of the society. However, in the present context, the investment was made from amounts that had already attained the character of surplus profits in the hands of the assessee, thereby maintaining the nexus with the principal business.

Additionally, the High Court's approach was supported by decisions of the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka High Courts in The Vavveru Cooperative Rural Bank Ltd. and Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Limited, which upheld the view that interest income on deposits made from surplus funds of co-operative banks retains its character as income from banking business and is therefore eligible for deduction under section 80P.

The Tribunal in a recent decision involving a similar issue (Thrissur District Electricity Board Employees Co-op Society Limited) also followed the Sahyadri Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. verdict, reinforcing the principle that interest income earned on deposits made from surplus funds is deductible under section 80P.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction on the ground that the deposits were made from surplus funds, thereby severing the nexus between the interest income and the principal business income. However, the Tribunal found this reasoning untenable in light of the binding judicial precedents.

The Tribunal emphasized that the interest income earned on deposits from surplus funds of the co-operative bank continues to be integrally related to the business of the bank and hence qualifies for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal distinguished the facts from The Totgars' case, underscoring that the surplus funds in the instant case had already attained the character of profits of the assessee, and the interest income derived therefrom cannot be treated as income from other sources.

Key evidence and findings: The factual record established that the assessee is a co-operative bank which earned interest income from deposits placed with scheduled banks. The Assessing Officer's disallowance was premised on the assertion that the deposits were from surplus funds, but there was no material to show that such interest income lacked connection with the banking business.

Application of law to facts: Applying the principles laid down in the Sahyadri Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. judgment and other allied decisions, the Tribunal found that the interest income earned on deposits made from surplus funds retained its character as income from banking business. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(d).

Treatment of competing arguments: The Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) took the view that the interest income was not eligible for deduction because it was earned on deposits from surplus funds, which allegedly broke the nexus with the principal business income. The Tribunal rejected this argument, relying on judicial precedents that clarified the distinction between interest income that rightfully belongs to the society and that which accrues to individual members. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s partial allowance insufficient and allowed the appeal fully.

Conclusions: The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) in respect of interest income earned on deposits made from surplus funds. The appeal was allowed accordingly.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

The Tribunal's crucial legal reasoning is encapsulated in the following verbatim excerpt from its decision in a similar case:

"'We also find force in the submission of the learned Senior counsel, distinguishing the decision of the Supreme Court in M/s. The Totgars' Cooperative Sale Society Limited (supra), on the ground that the Court in that case had found that the Society concerned had appropriated amounts forming part of surplus receipts which were due to its members, and invested the same to earn interest during the period when the surplus receipts were in its hands. It was therefore that the court found that the interest earned by the Society through deposit of such receipts with banks in fact ought to have accrued to the benefit of the individual members and not to the Society itself; that in relation to the Society, it was to be treated as income from other sources since the interest income had lost its nexus with the principal income earned by the Society. The facts in the instant cases are entirely different and the investment concerned was of amounts that had already attained the character of surplus profits in the hands of the assessee. On this issue, therefore, we find ourselves in agreement with the view taken by the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka High Courts respectively in The Vavveru Cooperative Rural Bank Ltd. (supra) and Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Limited (supra).'"

The core principles established are:

• Interest income earned by a co-operative bank on deposits made from surplus profits retains its character as income from the banking business.
• Such interest income is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
• The nexus between the interest income and the principal business income is not severed merely because the deposits are made from surplus funds.
• The distinction drawn by the Supreme Court in The Totgars' case applies only where the interest income accrues to individual members and not to the society itself.

Final determination on the issue was that the assessee's appeal is allowed, reversing the disallowance of deduction under section 80P in respect of interest income on deposits.