Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2025 (7) TMI 769 - HC - GSTCancellation of petitioner s registration under Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 - petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax interest late fee penalty and any other sum required to be paid - HELD THAT - Reliance placed in the case of M/S. MOHANTY ENTERPRISES VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER CT GST ODISHA CUTTACK AND OTHERS 2022 (11) TMI 1521 - ORISSA HIGH COURT where it was held that In that view of the matter the delay in Petitioner s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes interest late fee penalty etc. due and complying with other formalities the Petitioner s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.
The Orissa High Court, through a bench of ARINDAM SINHA and M.S. SAHOO, addressed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice dated 16th March 2022 and an order dated 2nd May 2022 cancelling the petitioner's registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner, represented by Shri Debasish Hazra, sought relief including condonation of delay and expressed willingness to pay all outstanding tax liabilities, including tax, interest, late fee, and penalty.Relying on the Coordinate Bench's order in Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST (W.P. (C) No. 30374 of 2022), the Court reproduced the key holding: "the delay in Petitioner's invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner's application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."Applying the same reasoning, the Court directed that the petitioner's application for revocation of cancellation be considered upon compliance with payment and formalities, thereby disposing of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner "in the interest of revenue."
|