2025 (7) TMI 966 - AT - Income Tax

Disallowance of Cooly and Labour charges and disallowance of Farm Expenses - self-made vouchers gievn by assessee - HELD THAT - AO also accepted that generally this kind of expenditure are always incurred on self-made vouchers and there are no bills of third parties. AO further found that expenditure of this nature is common in the business carried on by the assessee. Despite the above fact the ld. AO and the CIT(A) upheld the disallowance as these expenditure are self-made vouchers genuineness of the same cannot be considered. We find that the ld. CIT(A) has ignored remand report wherein the ld. AO has categorically held that such expenditure are reasonable and common in the business. The remand report of the AO did not show that expenditure are not incurred wholly exclusively for the purpose of assessee s business. Merely because it is self-made voucher which is accepted to be common by the AO it does not become non-genuine. Therefore the confirmation of the disallowance of the above expenditure when it is merely 1% of the total turnover of the company is not justified. Accordingly ground Nos.3 4 of the appeal of the assessee are allowed. Farm expenses - AO in his remand report has accepted that these expenditure are Coolie charges at the farm of assessee income from which is already included in the gross revenue and the fact that agricultural activities requires Coolie and other labour charges. The AO categorically held that expenditure is reasonable but doubted the genuineness on account of self-made vouchers. There are many expenditure in the business for which the third party evidences are not available always. In such circumstances only self-made vouchers are prepared narrating the expenditure the person to whom it is paid and respective dates of payment etc. CIT(A) merely because of the self-made vouchers for expenses confirmed the disallowance is not correct. Therefore disallowance made by the ld. AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) of Coolie Labour charges and farm expenses is reversed and ld. AO is directed to delete the disallowance. Appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Summary

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered by the Tribunal in this appeal are:

• Whether the disallowance of Coolie and Labour charges amounting to Rs. 34,60,350/- by the Assessing Officer (AO) and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] is justified in the absence of third-party bills and on the ground that the vouchers are self-madeRs.
• Whether the disallowance of Farm Expenses amounting to Rs. 3,81,124/- on similar grounds of lack of documentary evidence and reliance on self-made vouchers is sustainableRs.
• Whether the expenditure incurred on Coolie & Labour charges and Farm Expenses can be considered as wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business despite the absence of conventional documentary proofRs.
• Whether the AO and CIT(A) erred in disregarding the remand report wherein the AO accepted the nature and reasonableness of these expendituresRs.
• Whether the disallowance of these expenses, which form a small percentage of the turnover, is excessive and unjustifiedRs.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1 & 2: Disallowance of Coolie & Labour Charges and Farm Expenses due to lack of third-party bills and reliance on self-made vouchers

Relevant legal framework and precedents: Under the Income-tax Act, 1961, expenses claimed by an assessee must be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business to be allowable as deductions. Documentary evidence is generally required to substantiate the genuineness of such expenses. However, in certain trades and businesses, especially those involving unskilled labour or agricultural activities, it is common practice that formal bills from third parties may not be available, and self-made vouchers are produced to record payments.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal carefully examined the remand report submitted by the AO, which acknowledged that the Coolie & Labour charges represent payments made to unskilled labourers for loading and unloading activities, a common and necessary business expense in the assessee's line of business. The AO also confirmed that such expenses are typically supported by self-made vouchers rather than third-party bills. Similarly, the farm expenses related to cultivation and maintenance of crops were also accepted by the AO as reasonable and connected to the business, though supported by self-made vouchers.

Key evidence and findings: The assessee produced original bills and vouchers during the remand proceedings, and the AO verified these documents. The AO's remand report explicitly stated that the nature of expenses was reasonable and common in the business. The AO did not find any indication that these expenses were not incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The CIT(A), however, disregarded these findings and upheld the disallowance solely on the ground that the vouchers were self-made and not third-party bills.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal held that mere absence of third-party bills does not render the expenditure non-genuine if the nature of the business and the mode of payment justify the use of self-made vouchers. The AO's acceptance of the reasonableness and business connection of the expenses, combined with the production of original vouchers, sufficed to establish the genuineness of the expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) erred in ignoring the AO's remand report and in mechanically disallowing the expenses.

Treatment of competing arguments: The Revenue argued that self-made vouchers are not reliable and do not establish genuineness. The assessee contended that in their business, such expenses are necessarily supported by self-made vouchers and that these expenses are essential and reasonable. The Tribunal sided with the assessee, finding that the AO's own acceptance of the expenses' reasonableness and business necessity outweighed the mere technicality of voucher type.

Conclusions: The disallowance of Coolie & Labour charges and Farm Expenses on the ground of self-made vouchers was not justified. The expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business and were reasonable in amount.

Issue 3: Whether the disallowance is excessive considering the quantum of expenditure relative to turnover

Relevant legal framework and precedents: The principle of proportionality and reasonableness of expenses is a relevant consideration in tax assessments. Expenses that are minimal in proportion to turnover and consistent with the nature of business are generally accepted as business expenses.

Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal noted that the Coolie & Labour charges amounted to less than 1% of the company's turnover, indicating that the expenses were not inflated or excessive. This fact further supported the genuineness and reasonableness of the expenditure.

Key evidence and findings: The AO's remand report and the assessee's submissions confirmed the modest proportion of these expenses relative to turnover.

Application of law to facts: The Tribunal applied the principle that minor expenses, consistent with business operations, should not be disallowed merely on technical grounds.

Treatment of competing arguments: The Revenue did not dispute the proportion but relied on procedural grounds for disallowance. The Tribunal found this approach untenable.

Conclusions: The disallowance was excessive and unjustified given the small proportion of expenses relative to turnover.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

The Tribunal held that:

"Merely because it is self-made voucher which is accepted to be common by the AO, it does not become non-genuine."

"The remand report of the AO did not show that expenditure are not incurred wholly & exclusively for the purpose of assessee's business."

"The confirmation of the disallowance of the above expenditure, when it is merely 1% of the total turnover of the company, is not justified."

Core principles established include:

• Expenses supported by self-made vouchers can be accepted as genuine if the nature of business justifies such practice and the AO accepts the reasonableness and business connection of the expenditure.
• Disallowance of expenses solely on the ground of absence of third-party bills is not justified where the AO's own findings support the genuineness and necessity of the expenses.
• Reasonableness and proportionality of expenses relative to turnover is a relevant factor in assessing the allowability of business expenditure.

Final determinations on each issue:

• The disallowance of Coolie & Labour charges of Rs. 34,60,350/- was reversed.
• The disallowance of Farm Expenses of Rs. 3,81,124/- was reversed.
• The AO was directed to delete the disallowance and recompute the income accordingly.