Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2025 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2025 (7) TMI 1221 - AT - Income Tax


The ITAT Chandigarh, in appeal for AY 2017-18, addressed the rectification order under section 154 passed by CPC adjusting Rs. 8.27 Lacs related to EPF withdrawal. The assessee had withdrawn Rs. 8,34,372 comprising employees' contribution (Rs. 6,69,000), employer's contribution, and respective interest components. Since the qualifying period of 5 years was not met, the withdrawal was taxable. The interest amounts and employer's contribution were undisputedly taxable and correctly adjusted. The primary dispute concerned the employees' contribution of Rs. 6.69 Lacs. The assessee contended that these contributions were made in earlier years without claiming deduction under section 80C. As per Rule 9 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule, if no deduction under section 80C was claimed previously, the income tax is to be computed by adding the contribution to the respective earlier years, effectively disallowing the deduction retrospectively. Since the assessee never claimed such deduction, the adjustment on this amount was unjustified. The Tribunal held: "Since the assessee never claimed the deduction u/s 80C on these contributions, the adjustment to that extent deserves to be deleted." Consequently, the adjustment of Rs. 6.69 Lacs was deleted, and the AO was directed to recompute income accordingly. The appeal was partly allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates