Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1988 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1988 (2) TMI 380 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......p.) had refused to receive the notice because it pertained to the erstwhile M/s. Madho Mahesh Sugar Mills. In the aforesaid circumstances, and in the absence of any evidence to show that the appeal has been filed by an authorised representative or person or legal entity who is competent to file the appeal, we dismiss the appeal as not maintainable.
|