Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
1996 (6) TMI 148 - AT - Central Excise
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing Sulphuric Acid, claimed deduction for servicing/filling charges, which was disallowed by the Department. Refund claims were rejected by Assistant Collector and Collector (Appeals). The charges were considered part of assessable value, not post manufacturing expenses. Appeals were dismissed. (1996 (6) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI)
|