Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1996 (4) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......or another date so that the appellant may also be present on the next date and the proprietor of the appellant was not feeling well. We do not think these grounds are sufficient for adjournment, particularly in an old case. The Advocate did not care to remain present and move the application for adjournment himself. 2. emsp The appeal is dismissed.
|