Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1996 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1996 (5) TMI 227 - CEGAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......ch they were made. Such action was therefore necessary before they became marketable. As ink was used in the process of testing it has to be considered an input. In view of this finding, I do not consider it necessary to consider the arguments of non-application for the earlier period of limitation. 5. emsp Appeal allowed. Impugned order set aside.
|