Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1998 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1998 (2) TMI 199 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......f the Act is absent. The Department has no case that Crompton must be regarded holding company of the respondent. Collector (Appeals) was, therefore, justified in holding that there was no relationship as alleged in the show cause notice and found by the Assistant Collector. 4. emsp We find no ground to interfere and accordingly dismiss the appeal.
|