Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1998 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

1998 (4) TMI 222 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Classification of wired glass under the new Central Excise Tariff.

Analysis:
1. The case involved the classification of wired glass under the new Central Excise Tariff in force from 28-2-1996. The appellants, M/s. Shree Vallabh Glass Works Ltd., claimed that wired glass was not excisable. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) had determined that wired glass fell under Heading No. 70.02 of the Central Excise Tariff.

2. The Tribunal carefully considered the matter and noted that wired glass is a type of glass. Chapter Note 5 under Chapter 70 of the Tariff clarified that the term 'glass' included various types, including fused quartz and other fused silica. Additionally, Chapter Note 2 provided specific explanations regarding the classification of glass under Heading No. 70.02.

3. Heading No. 70.02 of the Tariff encompassed various types of glass, including cast glass, rolled glass, drawn glass, blown glass, and surface ground or polished glass in sheets. The Tribunal highlighted that the new Central Excise Tariff, based on the Harmonised System of Nomenclature (HSN), guided the classification process.

4. Referring to a previous Supreme Court decision in Collector of Central Excise, Shillong v. Wood Craft Products Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized the importance of resolving tariff classification disputes based on the nomenclature indicated by the HSN. The Tribunal underscored that judgments under the old Central Excise Tariff might not be applicable when classifying products under the new Tariff.

5. Ultimately, after considering all relevant aspects, the Tribunal found no merit in the appeal and rejected it accordingly. The decision upheld the classification of wired glass under Heading No. 70.02 of the Central Excise Tariff based on the provisions of the new Tariff and the guidance provided by the HSN.

This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal principles, interpretations of the Central Excise Tariff, and the significance of the HSN in resolving classification disputes.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates