Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1998 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1998 (3) TMI 416 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......erently or attaching a different meaning to those explanations is no retraction. This appears to be only a device to get away from the rigours of penalty etc. We, therefore, hold that retraction is a mere formality and an after-thought. 36. emsp But for the above modifications, the impugned order is upheld and the appeal is disposed of accordingly.
|