Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
1999 (3) TMI 257 - AT - Central Excise
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi ruled that the benefit of Notification No. 175/86-C.E. cannot be denied to goods with brand names "Sumeet" or "Sears" as they were not meant for flex cords. The lower appellate authority's decision was upheld, but it was noted that if the cords were sold separately as spare parts, the benefit of the notification would not apply. The Revenue's appeal was partially accepted for further verification.
|