Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued soon

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1999 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password

 

1999 (11) TMI 328 - AT - Central Excise

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled that charges incurred for bending bars during loading are to be included in the assessable value as it improves marketability. The appellant's claim for exclusion was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed.

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 466 introduces thousand rupee penalties bu...
F: Taxpayer faces 100% penalty under Section 122 despite voluntary tax pa...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 465 mirrors existing penalty structure but...
C: Import policy amended for gold alloys exceeding 1% weight now includes...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 464 imposes penalties up to Rs 1 lakh on t...
F: Suppliers' post-supply discounts without predetermined agreements don'...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 463 imposes Rs 10,000 penalty on professio...
H: New CSR-1 Form Required for Compliance Reporting Under Section 135 fro...
F: Builder with partial occupation certificate for 23 floors faces GST co...
F: Doctor's GST turnover calculation includes hospital services, FD inter...
F: Cake gels for bakery industries classified under HSN 2106 as food prep...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 462 imposes one lakh rupee penalty for ina...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 461 sets penalties Rs 10,000-1,00,000 for ...
T: Non-resident entity with liaison office faces identical penalty struct...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 459 sets daily penalties up to INR 500,000...
N: Central Government notifies IREDA redeemable bonds as Long-Term Specif...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 458 sets 2% penalty for non-disclosure of ...
A: India's GST system struggles with compliance paradox as enforcement pr...
A: EOUs must pay customs duty, cess, and IGST on unutilized materials whe...
A: Section 18 GST Act allows input tax credit during registration transit...
A: Shipping bill SB0006 error blocks IGST refund due to data mismatches b...
A: Tax authorities cannot deny refunds by disregarding binding judicial p...
A: Tax demand order exceeding show-cause notice amount violates Section 7...
H: Petition Allowed for Revised TRAN-1 Form Under Section 140 CGST Act; M...
H: Cancellation of registration without proper SCN service violates natur...
H: Section 263 IT Act: Court Upholds Revision but Orders AO to Provide Re...
H: ITAT Allows Deduction of Software Expenses, Excludes Personal Gifts Un...
H: ITAT Upholds Bank's Amortization, Depreciation, and Deductions Under S...
H: ITAT Confirms Depreciation on Leasehold Improvements, Upholds Rs. 4 Cr...
H: Reopening Notice Valid if Issued Within Six Years Under Section 148; A...