Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2000 (6) TMI 350 - AT - Central Excise
Issues:
1. Interpretation of ad hoc exemption order regarding differential duty on imported TMBP Coils used in manufacturing Electrolytic tinplates. 2. Determination of whether the quantity of scrap generated during manufacturing affects the liability for paying differential duty on TMBP Coils. Analysis: Issue 1: The case involved interpreting an ad hoc exemption order regarding differential duty on imported TMBP Coils used in manufacturing Electrolytic tinplates. The order required a declaration that the coils were intended for the specified purpose. The appellant argued that as long as this condition was met, there should be no liability for paying additional duty. The advocate emphasized that the exemption order did not mandate a tonne-to-tonne output-input correlation but focused on the intended use of the imported coils. The Tribunal agreed with this interpretation, stating that the fulfillment of the condition in the exemption order was sufficient to avoid differential duty liability. Issue 2: The second issue revolved around whether the quantity of scrap generated during the manufacturing process affected the liability for paying differential duty on TMBP Coils. The Department contended that any scrap generated indicated that a portion of the imported coils was not utilized for manufacturing, warranting additional duty. However, the appellant argued that process losses and scrap generation were inherent in the manufacturing process and did not signify underutilization of the imported coils. The Tribunal concurred with the appellant, noting that it was technologically impossible to have a tonne-to-tonne correlation between input and output in such manufacturing processes. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the entire quantity of imported coils should be considered used for manufacturing, regardless of scrap generation, and set aside the order imposing the additional duty. In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order imposing the additional duty on the imported TMBP Coils used in manufacturing Electrolytic tinplates.
|