TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2000 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

 

2000 (10) TMI 379 - AT - Central Excise

  1. 2002 (4) TMI 384 - AT
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the respondent who sold vibration dampers at two prices to Kirloskar Cummins Ltd. The department's appeal was dismissed as there was no illegality in selling at two prices to the same buyer, one as a dealer and the other as a manufacturer of original equipment. The buyer's status justified the dual pricing, and the appeal was rejected.

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: GST payments under protest allowed despite no explicit statutory provi...
F: Taxpayer faces RCM liability notice for rent to unregistered landlords...
F: IT service exporters under LUT don't need signatures on electronic GST...
F: Taxpayer challenges proportionate refund formula after Net ITC computa...
F: Client's vehicle rental to goods transportation agency exempt from GST...
F: E-invoices not registered on IRP within 30 days create penalty risks a...
F: Person developing and selling plots on own land with 20 crore income e...
F: Job worker retains scrap as partial payment - principal must issue tax...
H: Kerala SGST Updates Delegation for Waiver Applications Under Section 1...
H: Kerala GST Department implements Section 74A procedural changes for st...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 363 mirrors existing tribunal powers with ...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 362 modernizes appellate process maintaini...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 361(2) creates dual appointment system for...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 introduces Clause 361 reforming tribunal constitu...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 360 maintains appellate powers identical t...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 359 mirrors 1961 Act appeal procedures but...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 358 retains appeal procedures from Section...
A: Committee of Creditors holds commercial wisdom to approve resolution p...
A: Electronic Credit Ledger with negative balance cannot be blocked under...
A: India's GST dual taxation model faces federal tensions over Council au...
A: Tax officer must use multiple service methods under Section 169 when t...
A: GST completes eight years with Rs 20 trillion revenue but faces credit...
A: Section 74 CGST notice invalid without fraud allegations after Section...
H: GST demand order quashed for exceeding show-cause notice amount under ...
H: Petitioner's installment request must be considered within three weeks...
H: Detenue held in illegal custody beyond 24-hour limit violating Article...
H: Bail granted to accused in CGST evasion case upheld after chargesheet ...
H: GST appeal delay can be condoned under Section 5 of Limitation Act whe...
H: Arbitration award set aside for exceeding mandatory three-month timeli...
H: Service on Chartered Accountant insufficient for Section 260A appeals;...