Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2001 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2001 (7) TMI 344 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Disallowance of deductions on account of dyeing charges, trade discount, and cash discount from the assessable value of cotton yarn.
2. Entitlement of appellants to deductions on trade discount and cash discount.
3. Allowability of deductions on account of dyeing charges.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed against the order disallowing deductions on dyeing charges, trade discount, and cash discount from the assessable value of cotton yarn. The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the disallowance, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The appellants were engaged in manufacturing cotton yarn and opted for provisional assessment. The Deputy Commissioner disallowed deductions, which was upheld partially by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing deductions on trade discount, cash discount, and dyeing charges. The Tribunal emphasized that trade discounts should be allowed to be deducted from the sale price, as ruled by the Supreme Court in a previous case.

2. The Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to deductions on trade discount and cash discount as they had provided evidence of passing on these discounts to buyers. Invoices and other documents clearly indicated the discounts, and there was no evidence to suggest otherwise. The Tribunal held that the appellants had the right to claim these deductions as permissible under the law.

3. Regarding the dyeing charges, the Tribunal allowed deductions based on the fact that the appellants were manufacturers of grey yarn and not involved in the dyeing process. The dyeing process was carried out by job workers, who were considered independent manufacturers under the law. The Tribunal cited previous judgments and legal principles to support its decision. The Tribunal also discussed the definition of "time of removal" concerning goods removed from depots, emphasizing that the appellants were not liable for the dyeing charges. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowed the appeal, granting the appellants the deductions on octroi charges, dyeing charges, trade discount, and cash discount.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates