Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2001 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2001 (8) TMI 358 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......ngs (if any) against the importer (first stage dealer). The decision in Balmer and Lawrie (supra) is also not helpful to the Revenue in the present case inasmuch as the invoice dated 28-9-1998 issued by M/s. Naveen was one issued by a registered dealer under Rule 57G. 6. emsp In the result, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.
|