Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2001 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2001 (8) TMI 425 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......e, violation of Rule 173B is not established. It was also contended that Rule 226 was also attracted. I have perused the provisions of Rule 226. In the circumstances of the present case, I do not find that this Rule was attracted, therefore, there is no violation of Rule 173B. The impugned order is, therefore, I set aside and the appeal is allowed.
|