Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 1970 (3) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1970 (3) TMI 80 - SC - Companies LawWhether the company judge was not justified in rejecting the prayer for an adjournment? Registrar's petition did not disclose any ground for admitting the winding up petition and much less for advertising it? Whether the appellate Bench of the Bombay High Court was not competent to summarily dismiss the appeal? Held that:- As we are in agreement with the appellant's contention that the appellate Bench of the High Court was not competent to summarily dismiss the appeal, we have not thought it necessary to go into the other contentions advanced on its behalf. It is clear that appeals other than those mentioned therein are not to be placed for admission. In other words, they are entitled to be admitted as a matter of course. Therefore, the appellate Bench erred in summarily dismissing the appeal. It was bound to entertain the appeal and dispose of the same on merits. Appeal allowed.
|