Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2000 (11) TMI 891 - AT - Central Excise
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai in 2000 (11) TMI 891 stated that proceedings under Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules, which was omitted in 1980, could not continue. The Supreme Court ruling in Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. v. Union of India supported this, stating that proceedings under an omitted rule would lapse. As there was no saving provision in the amending Act, the show-cause notice issued to the appellant lapsed on the omission of Rule 10. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.
|