Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise 2007 2007 2007 (4) Central Excise - 2007 (4) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Central Excise - Case Laws

Showing 241 to 246 of 246 Records

• 2007 (4) TMI 9 - SUPREME COURT
  

  Rim Assembly – Department contended that Rim Assembly would not qualify for description as wheel and accordingly assessee was not entitled to the benefit of exemption – Authority dismiss the appeal.

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT
  

  Classification – Alleged that the assessee used to mis-declaration of products(puff) as ‘Chabena / Prasad’ and other other allegation imposed on him and accordingly demand for Rs 2.31crore as duty – After not finding any proof in support of it authority reject the allegation and allow the appeal

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 6 - SUPREME COURT
  

  EXIM -100% EOU - Alleged that appellant was not paying appropriate duties on the goods cleared by him - Appellant demand for exemption under Notificatio No. 2/95-CE rejected by Tribunal - Apex Court allowed the appeal and set aside the judgement of tribunal

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT
  

  Demand – Exemption – Deparment contended that none of the three product (naptha, sulphur & electricity) were petroleum products and therefore appellant were liable to pay duty – After considering the detail authority rejected the department contention

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 3 - CESTAT NEW DELHI
  

  Cenvat Credit of Service Tax paid on Outward transportation is not allowed. The removal of the final products from the factory premises, so as to clear the factory premises of such goods, would be clearance, and outward transport beyond the place of removal, cannot be read in the word ‘clearance’.

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 1 - CESTAT- AHBAD
  

  Service Tax - Pre-deposit - Good transport agent's service - Credit of service tax paid by manufacture on input service,prima-facie, admissible - pre-deposit of service tax credit waived

  ---

1 ....910111213