Case Laws |
Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 2003 2003 (4) This
|
Advanced Search Options
Case Laws
Showing 481 to 486 of 486 Records
-
2003 (4) TMI 6 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) - whether in the present case a substantial question of law arises for calling for a statement of case from the Tribunal - It is not disputed before us that the assessee did not file any explanation when the penalty proceeding was initiated. Held that calling for the statement of case in the present case is not warranted inasmuch as the Tribunal has rightly recorded that the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) in the case at hand was just and proper – Assessee’s appeal dismissed
-
2003 (4) TMI 5 - DELHI HIGH COURT
Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Retirement of Partner - "When a partner retires from a partnership, the partnership continues. The assets and the goodwill of the firm continue to remain the assets and the goodwill of the firm. All that the retiring partner gets is the value of his share in the partnership assets less its liabilities. It cannot, in such circumstances, be held, assuming that the retiring partner received less than what was his due, that the difference was something that he had transferred to the continuing partners within the meaning of 'transfer' of property for the purposes of the Gift-tax Act or that there was a gift liable to gift-tax."
-
2003 (4) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT
Held that cinema theatre as a "plant" is not entitled to depreciation and extra shift allowance as applicable to a "plant"
-
2003 (4) TMI 3 - SUPREME COURT
Whether Tribunal was right in holding that the interest on deposits with Tamil Nadu Electricity Board should be treated as income derived by the industrial under taking for the purpose of section 80HH - HC was justified in answering the question in favour of department
-
2003 (4) TMI 2 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Tribunal was right in allowing deduction u/s 32A in respect of the computers installed in the office premises - Tribunal was right in law in allowing the travelling expenses incurred on the staff members of the head office on their visit to the branch office of the assessee in India - Tribunal was not right in law in allowing maintenance expenses incurred by the assessee on the flat owned by it and provided to its employees
-
2003 (4) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT
Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the probable estate duty payable on the death of the life tenant has to be taken into account and the value of the property will be diminished by that for charge of wealth- tax in the hands of the remaindermen - High Court answered the question in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee - order of HC is correct
....
|
|