Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 2006 2006 (10) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Case Laws

Showing 461 to 480 of 489 Records

• 2006 (10) TMI 34 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI
  

  Penalty(Service tax)-Alleged that appellant were liable to pay service tax with interest-After considering all the fact penalty impose on him were reduced

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 33 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
  

  Valuation(Service tax)-Alleged that assessee were short paid the levy by not taking into consideration some taxable services- After considering all the fact and prior decision ,decision made in favour of assessee.

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 32 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
  

  Consulting Engineer – Service tax- Alleged that assessee were liable for service tax on his activity-After careful consideration decision made in favour of assessee by the respective authority.

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 30 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
  

  Demand(Service tax)-Cable Operator- Appellant argued that Multi System Operator shall not come within the purview service tax – After considering all facts decided that appellant were liable to pay service tax

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 29 - CESTAT, MUMBAI
  

  Penalty(Service tax)-Alleged that delay in payment of service tax- After considering the fact the penalty were not imposable especially in view of Extra Ordinary Tax Payer Friendly Scheme introduced by government

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 26 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
  

  Consulting Engineer- Alleged that activity performed by appellant is categrised under Consulting Engineer and service tax demanded thereon- After considering details impugned order set aside

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 25 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
  

  Demand(Service tax)-Appellants were clearing and forwarding agent procuring order and booking order on payment of commission- In view of larger bench decision said activity not classify under clearing and forwarding services

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 24 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
  

  Appeal- Limitation- Delay in filing appeal - Application for condonation of delay allowed - The stay application are allowed as the issue is covered in the assesse favour

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 23 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
  

  Demand and Interest- Security agency- Demand of service tax with interest by the lower authority - By higher authority in his decision penalty and interest set aside

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 22 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
  

  Cellular phones – WLL CDMA Hand Held Terminals works on cellular technologies cateogarised it under Mobile phones and its features also support as mobile phones – Eligible for benefit of Notification No. 6/2002 C.E. – Demand ,interest and penalty not justified

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 21 - CESTAT,MUMBAI
  

  EXIM -EPCG Scheme - A subsidiary company demanded for granting exemption from bank guarantee- Unit already defaulted ,so appeal infructuous and not survives.

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 20 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI
  

  Valuation(Central excise)-Appellant were used to charge different price from members and its non-members - Demand of interest for the period subsequent to enactment of section by the authority.

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 19 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD
  

  Valuation (Central Excise) – Tools/die manufactured and captively consumed in parts and components of Motor vechiles – Without included notional profit it can’t sold to manufacturer of motor vechile - Held that manufacturer of motor vechile is not owner of tools /die.

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 18 - CESTAT, MUMBAI
  

  Central Excise – Audit objection – No protective demands should be raised on the basis of audit objections which are contrary to CBEC circular – Impugned order set aside

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA (CHANDIGARH)
  

  Central Excise – Demand of interest –Assessee undertook to pay amount with interest and upto 31.3.2003, last payment was made –Demand raised by Deptt. on 19.8.2005, in this view demand could not be held to be beyond reasonable time –Omission of Sec 3A does not wipe out liability of assessee for the period during which scheme was in operation

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 16 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
  

  Central Excise – Vat paste – The process of conversion of vat powder into vat paste by adding glycerin, dispersing agent, water etc. does not amount to manufacture, if the vat powder is standardized/formulated or prepared dye

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 15 - CESTAT NEW DELHI
  

  Central Excise – Cenvat credit – Credit taken on RFO, LDO and furnace oil used as fuel in the manufacture of exempted as well as dutiable final goods, not deniable

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 13 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE
  

  Central Excise –The process of manufacturing of insta whitening system is not a new product, hence not excisable as held earlier –Tribunal ruling in the assesses own case is bound on the Commissioner when Tribunal earlier order had not been challenged or set aside –Revenue can not re-open the issue once it is settled by an earlier judgment

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 12 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Service Tax – Security agency provided services on commercial terms and registered under Punjab Ex-serviceman Act, 1978 - Service tax to be paid on gross amount received from the clients for the services rendered in connection with security to be treated as value for levy of service tax

  ---

• 2006 (10) TMI 11 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA (CHANDIGARH)
  

  Service Tax – Cable operator – Respondent petitions rejected on the ground that definition includes service to any person by cable operator including Multi Systems Operator(MSO) – Service tax not levied twice in the case of Multi Systems Operator – MSO liable to service tax

  ---

1 ....202122232425