Case Laws |
Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 1952 1952 (8) This
|
Advanced Search Options
Case Laws
Showing 21 to 23 of 23 Records
-
1952 (8) TMI 14
... ... ... ... ..... ted by the appellant or by his pleader or by his duly authorised agent. Rule 68(4) provides that on the date of hearing the appellant or his pleader or a registered accountant appointed by the appellant shall be heard. Similar provision is made in Rule 69(7) for cases before Judge (Revisions). There too a party himself or any practising lawyer of the High Court or of the District Judge s Court or a registered accountant has a right to be heard before the Judge (Revisions). These rules make it perfectly clear that while any agent has a right to act, that is, to present an application, to receive notices etc., the right to plead is restricted only to the applicant himself or a qualified pleader or a registered accountant engaged by a party. The applicant is neither a pleader nor a registered accountant and he had, therefore, no right to plead before the Judge (Sales Tax), (Appeals) or (Revisions). The application has no force and is dismissed with costs. Application dismissed.
-
1952 (8) TMI 13
Enforcement of orders of courts ... ... ... ... ..... t. This court certainly has the power and jurisdiction to adopt that course. But the question is one of propriety and whether it is proper to do so in a particular case. I have no doubt in my mind that an enforcement order such as the one before me calling upon the contributory to pay is an order which is executable under section 199 of the Indian Companies Act and section 46H of the Banking Companies Act, 1949, as a decree under the Civil Procedure Code by attachment and sale in this case by this court. I am not satisfied that in this case the applicant has taken the matter out of the scope of ordinary methods of execution by attachment and sale and qualified himself to get a receiver by way of execution. For these reasons I will make no order on this application. Having regard to the fact that the money remains unpaid there will be no order for costs also in favour of the respondents. The liquidator however will retain his own costs out of the estate. Certified for counsel.
-
1952 (8) TMI 12
Company when deemed unable to pay its debts ... ... ... ... ..... bserved that nothing has been shown in the affidavit which will even justify any enquiry to go behind the decree. Before I leave this branch of the law I should like to observe that the moving consideration in this branch of law as laid down by Lord Esher in Lennox In re ex parte Lennox was the language of the particular Bankruptcy Act which his Lordship was considering, namely, that the court had to be satisfied . This expression is not used in clauses (i) and (ii) of section 163(1) but is used only in clause (iii) where the company cannot be deemed to be unable to pay its debts unless it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that the company is unable to pay its debts. That proof to the satisfaction of the court is not in my judgment required in the events mentioned in clauses (i) and (ii) of section 163(1) of the Companies Act. For these reasons there will be an order for winding up of the company. Certified for counsel. Costs to come out of the assets of the company.
|
|