Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 1968 1968 (10) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Case Laws

Showing 81 to 84 of 84 Records

• 1968 (10) TMI 4 - KERALA HIGH COURT
  

  Estate Duty Act, 1953 - value of the forest lands - inclusion in total value of the estate for the purpose of estate duty

  ---

• 1968 (10) TMI 3 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT
  

  Expenditure was incurred by the company with a view to earn profits from the same methods and processes as before - this is not a case where the expenditure was incurred with a view to enlarge the goodwill of the company or to permanently improve the assets of the concern - allowable as revenue expenditure

  ---

• 1968 (10) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
  

  Validity of the order passed by the Tribunal under the signature of four of its members

  
  
  ... ...
  ... ... ..... r of the Tribunal. It must, therefore, be held that the appeals were disposed of by four Members of the Appellate Tribunal sitting together. We hold that the order passed by the Tribunal, dated July 8, 1958, under the signatures of four Members is invalid. In view of our answer to question No. 2, the various connected appeals filed by the assessee will have to be reheard by a Bench of the Appellate Tribunal properly constituted. The newly constituted Bench will have to reconsider the question whether the assessee is liable for the whole of the income from the business styled as Radha Vilas Karyalaya. Since the Tribunal will have to deal with question No. 1 afresh, we need not answer question No. 1 at all. Question No. 1 may be left open. We do not answer question No. 1 for the reasons given above. Our answer to question No. 2 referred to this court is in the negative. The applicant shall receive from the Commissioner of Income-tax, Lucknow, Rs. 200 as costs of this reference.

  ---

• 1968 (10) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT
  

  Plea that the provisions imposing liability to pay advance tax upon an agent of a non-resident infringe the equality clause of the Constitution has no substance - computation of advance tax is not dependent upon the completion of the previous year; it depends upon the rules prescribed by ss. 209, 210 & 212 - Assessee's petition is dismissed

  ---

12345